NeoChat

Comparisons

LLM comparison: GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek and open models

NeoChat Editorial3 min read

The major large language models in 2026 come from OpenAI (GPT), Anthropic (Claude), Google (Gemini), xAI (Grok), DeepSeek, and open-weight families such as Llama, Qwen and Mistral. The top three closed families are close in raw ability; the practical differences are in context size, tools, price and openness, so the right model depends on the task.

How the major LLM families compare

Model family Company Known strengths Context window (approx.) Open weights
GPT OpenAI All-round, tool use, image generation in ChatGPT Hundreds of thousands of tokens Some (gpt-oss)
Claude Anthropic Coding, long documents, instruction following 200K, up to 1M on some tiers No
Gemini Google Very long inputs, video and audio input, Google integration Up to 1M+ Gemma family only
Grok xAI Real-time X data, fewer refusals Large Older versions
DeepSeek DeepSeek Low-cost reasoning, math, code ~128K Yes
Llama, Qwen, Mistral Meta, Alibaba, Mistral Self-hosting, customization Varies by model Yes

Version names change every few months, so the table compares families rather than single releases. Check each provider’s model page for the current flagship.

Why benchmark scores are only part of the picture

Benchmarks such as coding tests, math competitions and crowd-voted arenas are useful for spotting big gaps, but the leading models are usually within a few points of each other. A model that tops one benchmark can feel worse in daily use if it ignores your instructions or writes in a style you have to rewrite. Treat leaderboards as a shortlist and test on your own prompts.

Compare by task, not by brand

Task Models that usually do well
Writing and editing Claude, GPT
Coding and debugging Claude, GPT, DeepSeek
Research with sources Perplexity (using several models), Gemini, GPT with search
Very long documents Gemini, Claude
Image generation GPT (in ChatGPT), Gemini, Grok
Low cost and self-hosting DeepSeek, Qwen, Llama, Mistral
Real-time social news Grok

Head-to-head comparisons

Each of these goes deeper on one pair:

Price differences between LLMs

For consumers, most flagship assistants cost about $20 a month in the US, with higher tiers from $100 to $300. For developers the gap is larger: API prices per million tokens range from cents for small or open models to tens of dollars for the most capable reasoning models. A cheaper model that is good enough for a task can cut costs by an order of magnitude.

Closed vs open models

Closed models (GPT, Claude, Gemini) are usually the most capable and come with polished apps, but you depend on the provider’s pricing and policies. Open-weight models can run on your own hardware, keep data private and be fine-tuned, at the cost of setup work and a small gap in quality. See our guide to open-source ChatGPT alternatives.

How to run your own LLM comparison

  1. Collect five to ten real prompts from your work.
  2. Run each prompt in two or three models with the same wording.
  3. Score accuracy, usefulness and editing time, not style alone.
  4. Repeat after major model updates, because rankings shift.

An all-in-one AI platform makes this easier because you can send one prompt to several models side by side. If you are new to the topic, start with what a large language model is.

Frequently asked questions

Which LLM is the best in 2026?

There is no single winner. OpenAI's GPT, Anthropic's Claude and Google's Gemini trade the lead on different benchmarks every few months. Pick by task: coding, long documents, research, images or cost.

How do I compare LLMs myself?

Write five to ten prompts from your real work, run each in two or three models, and score the answers on accuracy, usefulness and how much editing they need. Public leaderboards are a starting point, not a verdict.

What is the difference between an LLM and a chatbot?

The LLM is the model that generates text. The chatbot is the app around it, which adds features such as web search, file upload, memory and image generation.

Related articles